Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-12-14 MH Provider MeetingPage 1 of 5 Mental Health Provider Meeting Human Services Building Friday, December 14, 2012 Meeting Minutes  Welcome and Introductions Everyone introduced themselves and their agency affiliation.  Provider Announcements and Updates  Jennifer Johnson, Housing Program Specialist, discussed three grants that are HUD funded. Point in Time (PIT) counts must be completed annually for those grants. There are volunteers that complete HUD issued surveys. The next PIT count is January 30, 2013. If anyone would be interested in donating for the PIT count, Jen would be happy to email the list of what they would like to get for distribution or you may contact Jim or Cori.  Cori Seilhamer, MH Program Specialist, would like to remind everyone that if you have trainings or other items that would assist your staff that have no secondary education to submit those requests to Jim or Cori.  Family Development Credentialing (FDC) classes are scheduled to start in January. There are currently only 4 people signed up. In order for the classes to be held as planned, there needs to be more signed up.  Children’sAServices  CASSP Update o Kim Lucas, CASSP Coordinator, asked that people get CASSP involved in cases and situations earlier then they currently have been. If you know about a possible out-of-home placement need ahead of time, please contact Kim, so that we can start looking at options and service levels. Kim hopes to get things a little more coordinated earlier in high-profile –type cases. She is trying to work with schools with individuals that might not have Mental Health services but have behavioral issues. Kim is available to come to your agency to talk, whether it is BHRS staff or outpatient staff. Please contact Kim if you are interested at 709-2307.  TMCA Update – Michelle Mosher o Next week is TMCA/CBHNP Committee Meeting on Wednesday, December 19. It will be held at the CBHNP office at 10:00 a.m. On the agenda will be I/FST. MHA contracted with Shippensburg University to do an evaluation. The results of phase 1 will be presented during the meeting. During the evaluation, statistical analysis and provider feedback were looked at. Michelle said that providers should look for this in the next quarterly report. o Stakeholder Committee Meeting is changing from Bi-monthly to quarterly. It will be held on Thursday instead of Wednesday. If you have not received a flyer from Michelle, please contact her. Page 2 of 5 o Pyramid D&A on Phoenix Drive in Chambersburg is now credentialed for intensive outpatient treatment for adolescents.  CBHNP Update – Brian Gannon o CBHNP recently held a provider training for BHRS (Behavioral Health Rehabilitative Services) to allow them to get better information to train staff on policy and procedures. o CBHNP is currently planning for next summer’s Summer Therapy Activity Program (STAP). The State has made some changes to STAP.  MH ’sAIndividual/FamilyASatisfactionATeam Carrie Clippinger and Beth Palmatier attended the MH Provider Meeting to discuss Individual/Family Satisfaction Team (I/FST).  MHA has three separate teams in the I/FST program. They work to contact individuals to hear if they have complaints or to discuss services. They call people receiving services to ask questions about those services. Those three teams are TMCA, IM4Q and CHIPP. o TMCA – this team surveys individuals who receive MA services. There are three surveys created every year. One is for adults 18 years old and up, second one is a family survey with parents or guardians of children 13 years old and under, and the third one is the Youth survey for 13 years old to 21 years old or 18 years old depending on overall concerns. The team completes phone calls, face-to-face visits or mail surveys. o IM4Q – this team surveys individuals with Intellectual Disabilities. All these surveys are done face-to-face with a survey created through Temple. It is to get to the quality of their life and see if changes can be made to what will make them happier. These surveys are turned into Supports Coordinators to see what can be worked on. o CHIPP – this team surveys people who receive mental health services. Each provider gets a say in how their survey looks. There are 10 questions that are kept consistent on all surveys to see how the population is doing.  Carrie Clippinger asked what the surveys are used for and for thoughts/comments. MHA wants to see how they can make the surveys more useful. The following are statements from Providers: o Providers liked to see the individual statements that were actually said by the people taking the surveys. It helps because it is individualized to staff. It allows giving suggestions. o It is a direct response to a service from a person receiving services. It is put into outcomes and used across programs to look at organizational changes. It helps to address issues or concerns with Quality Management Plans. The surveys become an indicator or section of those plans. o One provider stated that it seems like it is unknown how honest the people completing the surveys really are. They would like to see them improved. The provider currently does internal surveys and is not Page 3 of 5 finding issues internally but finds issues when MHA’s surveys are completed. o When it comes to the IM4Q surveys, information is getting misinterpreted if it is just the client and surveyor. Individuals in the IM4Q surveys have difficulty talking. Support Coordinators need to address those considerations and it is challenging for them to do when things are misinterpreted. The provider suggested having someone on their end (provider end) to sit in on the survey to help filter the answer. * With this being said, Carrie stated that MHA has continuous trainings with their surveyors to help them understand situations like this. If providers feel that the surveyors do not completely understand, she asked that providers come to speak to their staff to help with on-going trainings.  Carrie asked how people see their surveys - are they taking them seriously, do they feel they are not helpful, etc.: o They are taken seriously. They want to see feedback. However, there is element of not understanding at times. o One provider has had Beth Palmatier come in and talk to staff to explain what the surveys are all about. Beth discussed that with the IM4Q survey, they do not have say in the questions so some questions do not relate to certain individuals. The provider stated that it is a lot different having an internal survey versus having someone else come in and complete it (such as MHA).  There is a two day survey training coming up in January. Survey Meetings are every two weeks to discuss problems with surveys or training topics. Guest speakers are brought in during those meetings. If any provider wants to come talk to the group at MHA or you have any ideas for training topics, contact Carrie Clippinger or Beth Palmatier.  There was a survey from MHA for Providers at the MH Provider Meeting to complete and return to Carrie or Beth. On the survey, it can be left anonymous or you may put your agency name on it. Please return these surveys to Carrie or Beth.  Friendly Reminders for Our Providers All reports have been received that were due prior to this meeting. Reports due since our last MH Provider Meeting:  September 15th: MCR Report (Program funded providers only)  November 15th: Quarterly Report of Expenditures (July-September) Reports due prior to our next MH Provider Meeting:  December 31st: Audited Reports (for fiscal year ending June 30th)  February 15th: Internal Quality of Service Survey and Quarterly Report of Expenditures (October-December)  March 1st: Contract related documents for the new fiscal year – o Appendix A o Budget/Rate Letter o Staff Roster (if appropriate) Page 4 of 5 o Unit Assumptions (if appropriate) o Budget Narrative (if appropriate)  Psychiatric Admissions Reporting Overview  Jim Gilbert, MH Program Specialist, gave a brief overview of the psychiatric admissions report that was handed out during the Provider Meeting. There has been a reduction in number of days and admissions in the third quarter between last year and this year. If you did not get the Psychiatric Admissions Report and would like one, please contact Jim.  County Announcements/Information  N/A  Supported Employment Initiative Updates  There was an individual from PA CareerLink who presented during the March MH provider meeting. There were two individuals from an agency in Harrisburg that presented and provided training for Front Line and Middle Line Supervisor Training a couple months ago.  MH/ID/EI has been working with providers to contract goals and objectives. Through HUD, we have funding to add some employment piece that Jennifer Johnson, Housing Program Specialist, oversees. Cori Seilhamer, MH Program Specialist, purchased a variety of employment job skills and resumes. This will be distributed to Keystone Center, various shelters, WIN, etc.  Penni Baker, from AHEDD is still available to do Social Security Benefits Counseling. She can work with individuals whether they are open and authorized with AHEDD or not. Please contact Penni for more information.  Jim discussed that at upcoming Provider Meetings, we will continue to give updates on what we are doing regarding the supported employment initiative.  Monitoring FY 12-13 Contract Expenditures  Correction from what was reported during the meeting. Jim Gilbert, MH Program Specialist, discussed that there will be some changes to the format of vendor agreements. The boilerplate contracts will remain unchanged. Claire and Hannah Herman-Snyder, County solicitor, are working on the format now. Jim stated that providers should watch their email inbox regarding the updates to this.  Ed Franchi, Fiscal Consultant for MH/ID/EI, stated that Claire wanted him to ask providers to bear with us as we are going through changes due to the Block Grant funding. We really need to stay on top of our dollars (contract and fiscal wise) and be timelier than we have been. The key focus is to keep dollars within the MH program. In order to do that, we need to better know where each provider is anticipating ending the fiscal year. Therefore, there is a possibility that providers might hear from Jim or Cori asking them to project to the end of the fiscal year what you will spend. If a provider is not going to spend their entire allocation (or contract amount), we want to take that money and use it in another area within the MH program. If you are projected to run over, we need to know that also in case we need to shuffle Page 5 of 5 dollars around. As a result of the Block Grant, we will most likely not be using the one time funding opportunities as a way to use some of our funding as we have in years past. The Block Grant did not do away with cost settlement. We still have to abide by 4300 regulations.  Cori Seilhamer, MH Program Specialist, asked if you still have projects and ideas that the agency wants to work on, you should still submit those to her or Jim so they can look at it and take into consideration. This must be done as soon as possible, before the 4th quarter.  There were questions whether retained revenue will still exist. Ed’s response was yes, it is still in 4300 regulations but possibly no because it is always contingent in available funds. It may change. Things will be kept where it is for the first year in the block grant. Ed also stated that retained revenue checks were sent out. If you received the check and did not send the letter back, please make sure we get that letter so we have it on file.  Cost Settlement – Ed discussed that in terms of prior year’s cost settlement, there is some available funding, so hopefully providers will be getting more information in the next couple months. Ed still has a few outstanding issues to figures out exactly what is available. Some providers owed MH/ID/EI back money and are paying it back. It will not be all of what we owe providers. If you have any questions regarding the letter you receive, give Ed a call.  Outsourcing Case Management  The Commissioners have decided to outsource MH, ID and EI case management. Service Access & Management, Inc. will be the provider of case management. They are based in Reading, Berks County. SAM is currently operational in 13 counties, 4 of those being joinders. They come with a good reputation. The current plan is that case management’s office will remain where they are, at the Admin Annex. The tentative transition date is April 1st. The Administrative staff will stay at the Human Services Building and will remain part of the County. If you have any more specific questions, contact Claire Hornberger, MH/ID/EI Administrator. The meeting was adjourned. Next meeting: Friday, March 8, 2013 starting at 10:00 a.m. in the Human Services Building. 2013 Meeting Schedule (all second Fridays starting at 10:00 a.m.) June 14th September 13th December 13th